TimesPeople: An important first step

TimesPeople will be marked as the beginning of a key revolution in newspaper Web sites.

Not because of what it is — a pretty underwhelming social network based on recommending stories at nytimes.com — but because of the doors it’ll open to a more social experience in consuming news.

Shoving content onto existing social networks isn’t going to save the industry. Newspaper organizations need to focus on becoming the social network.

In addition to the obligatory forums and blogs, the newspaper site will be home to the mingling that’s happening on Facebook or MySpace, the dating that’s happening on Match.com, and the conversation that’s happening on Twitter. It will take the fun and utility of those other sites and infuse them with the one advantage every newspaper has: Local, local, local.

None of that is happening on TimesPeople, an effective recommendation system with few frills, but it does move us in that direction by the all-important step of introducing the reader profile. My profile just has my name, location, and a story I recommended for the sake of trying out the service.

But maybe that profile will expand and enable me to have the headlines I want, from only the categories I want, delivered to that profile page. Maybe all my activity on the site — forum postings, story comments and blog entries — will be displayed on that profile page. Maybe I’ll be able to RSVP to entertainment listings through my profile.

Maybe that profile will expand and enable me to include everything I have in my Facebook profile. Maybe that profile will enable me to declare that I’m single, and to search for other single Times readers.

Maybe that site will incorporate conversational tools, whether it’s wall postings, intra-site messages, instant messaging or microblogging.

The newspaper site will defragment the local Web space, centralizing it around the news product that we desperately need to sell. Meanwhile, it gives the readers the personalization, control and voice that they increasingly need.

When you think about what it could become in the future, TimesPeople seems pretty insignificant right now. But let’s use it as the starting point toward the radical rethinking that every newspaper site really needs.

  • I think its important to note that NYT has said all along that it is not (and does not want to be) a social platform. Its not out to be the next big social networking site – that would miss the point.

    However, if you’re going to use that idea then I would think Twitter, not Facebook.

    I think the big picture is freeing the data – allowing the portability of your interactions to used elsewhere.

    Regardless, I hope you’ll agree that its a step in the right direction.

  • I actually think the social network model would work better for the mid-sized and smaller papers, as opposed to the NYT. I can understand why you wouldn’t want to compete head-on with Facebook.

    I absolutely think it’s a step in the right direction, and a nice tool in itself, too. I particularly enjoy the seamless Facebook application.

  • Rob Ehrmann

    Danny (not sure if you still go by that but whatever) I subscribed to your blog on my google reader. Just thought you’d like to know that you’ve got a reader in SLC. Anyway I was reading my favorite op-ed writer today (Leonard Pitts, gotta love him) and came across this: http://www.miamiherald.com/living/columnists/leonard_pitts/story/574088.html

    seems like there may be more support out there on this topic. Anyway, just thought I’d share.

    Rob

  • Rob Ehrmann

    Then again, in rereading the article, he still misses the fundamental possibility of the network as a social connection point. I guess my point was that it appears that there’s an awareness that change is necessary, but I think that until a model actually works for a newspaper as well as say Daily Kos (user generated content, sense of community interest, diversification of specialties etc.) or some of the other blogs I read, the traditional media will remain a secondary source of breaking news for me: nice and typically accurate, but slow and not tailor-made to the digital era. Newspapers have the potential to bring that special sense of shared place (geography, culture, regionalism etc.) that I think many of the “big” blogs lack, but they’re definitely not there yet.

    Well that’s my 2 cents and more.

  • Pingback: TNTJ: Review of The Journal-Courier Web Site | By Daniel Victor()

  • Pingback: Tomorrow’s News, Tomorrow’s Journalists » Blog Archive » Journal and Courier hits the basics, but needs to push forward()

  • Pingback: TNTJ: Review of The Journal and Courier Web site | blogHarrisburg()