<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five months later, reflections on Ning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bydanielvictor.com/2008/07/02/five-months-later-ning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bydanielvictor.com/2008/07/02/five-months-later-ning/</link>
	<description>In praise of collaborative journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes a Ning social networking site won&#8217;t work for your beat &#124; BeatBlogging.Org</title>
		<link>http://bydanielvictor.com/2008/07/02/five-months-later-ning/comment-page-1/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes a Ning social networking site won&#8217;t work for your beat &#124; BeatBlogging.Org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bydanielvictor.com/?p=83#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>[...] of the original 13 beat bloggers, Daniel Victor, is stepping away from his Ning social network that he built for his beat because of a lack of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the original 13 beat bloggers, Daniel Victor, is stepping away from his Ning social network that he built for his beat because of a lack of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suzanne</title>
		<link>http://bydanielvictor.com/2008/07/02/five-months-later-ning/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bydanielvictor.com/?p=83#comment-107</guid>
		<description>The thing with Ning is that it gives the audience just one more thing to sign in to, which gets tiresome. You have to really work on its upkeep and continuously post content on Ning that makes people want to bother checking in nearly every day. And sometimes things that are newsworthy aren&#039;t always the most inspiring for people. Email and social networks are easy to ignore; phone calls, not so much.

I&#039;m working a separate project involving Ning, and I&#039;m going to turn some of the RSS feeds into email lists via FeedBurner -- that way, the content comes to them and reminds them in daily digests to revisit the site. I don&#039;t know if it will make a difference, but I&#039;ll give it a shot. I know I&#039;d appreciate something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing with Ning is that it gives the audience just one more thing to sign in to, which gets tiresome. You have to really work on its upkeep and continuously post content on Ning that makes people want to bother checking in nearly every day. And sometimes things that are newsworthy aren&#8217;t always the most inspiring for people. Email and social networks are easy to ignore; phone calls, not so much.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m working a separate project involving Ning, and I&#8217;m going to turn some of the RSS feeds into email lists via FeedBurner &#8212; that way, the content comes to them and reminds them in daily digests to revisit the site. I don&#8217;t know if it will make a difference, but I&#8217;ll give it a shot. I know I&#8217;d appreciate something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sholin</title>
		<link>http://bydanielvictor.com/2008/07/02/five-months-later-ning/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Sholin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bydanielvictor.com/?p=83#comment-106</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the nature of Ning - a big, scalable social network with an activity feed - is that it works better with larger numbers of participants?

Trying to think of what works better for 30 active commenters on community news... 

Maybe the old-school anonymous message board serves their needs, even if it doesn&#039;t serve ours as journalists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the nature of Ning &#8211; a big, scalable social network with an activity feed &#8211; is that it works better with larger numbers of participants?</p>
<p>Trying to think of what works better for 30 active commenters on community news&#8230; </p>
<p>Maybe the old-school anonymous message board serves their needs, even if it doesn&#8217;t serve ours as journalists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

